Mager kropsmassaberegner

Sådan bruges denne lommeregner

1. Indtast Weight (kg)
2. Indtast Height (cm)
3. Indtast Gender
4. Klik på knappen Beregn
5. Læs resultatet vist under lommeregneren

What is Lean Body Mass?

Lean Body Mass (LBM) is everything in your body except fat — muscle, bone, organs, blood, water, and connective tissue. It's the metabolically active portion of your body that burns calories, generates force, and determines athletic performance. LBM is calculated as: LBM = Total Body Weight − Fat Mass.

LBM is critical for runners because: (1) it determines BMR through muscle mass content, (2) it drives running power and economy, and (3) it sets the functional floor for how much body weight reduction is safe and beneficial for performance. A runner cannot improve performance by losing LBM — only by losing fat while maintaining or increasing muscle.

LBM Formulas: Boer, James, and Hume

Several equations estimate LBM from height, weight, and sex without body composition measurements:

W = weight in kg, H = height in cm. These estimates are useful for clinical purposes but body composition measurement (DEXA scan, BodPod, underwater weighing) provides much greater accuracy for athletes.

LBM and Body Fat Percentage for Athletes

Body fat percentage and LBM are two sides of the same coin. Reference ranges:

Elite male distance runners typically have 5–10% body fat; elite women 10–15%. These are not targets for recreational runners — they're the result of extreme training volumes and years of metabolic adaptation, not something to chase through restriction.

Preserving LBM While Losing Fat

For runners pursuing fat loss, preserving LBM is the primary goal alongside the loss of fat. Muscle loss during a cut impairs running economy, reduces power output, and lowers BMR (making continued fat loss harder). Evidence-based LBM preservation strategies:

• High protein (2.0–2.4 g/kg): The single most important factor. Research by Helms (2014) found that lean, trained athletes need higher protein during restriction (2.3–3.1 g/kg) to maintain muscle mass compared to heavier individuals.
• Resistance training: 2× per week of strength training preserves muscle tissue during caloric restriction through mechanical tension and metabolic stress signals.
• Moderate deficit: Deficits of 300–500 kcal/day cause minimal muscle loss in trained athletes with adequate protein. Larger deficits accelerate muscle catabolism.
• Creatine monohydrate: 3–5g/day supports muscle power output during restriction phases and may attenuate LBM loss.

LBM and Running Performance

The relationship between LBM and running performance is nuanced. For running, power-to-weight ratio is critical — specifically, the ratio of functional muscle mass to total body weight.

Adding LBM (muscle) without adding fat improves running performance if the muscle is functionally relevant. Research shows: 8 weeks of plyometric training increases running economy by 2–8% in trained runners by improving neuromuscular efficiency and elastic energy storage — without significant body weight change.

Losing fat while maintaining LBM improves running economy because it reduces the non-functional weight that muscles must propel forward with each stride. For a 70 kg runner, losing 3 kg of fat while maintaining LBM reduces the weight of each step by 4.3%, translating to roughly 2–3 minutes marathon time improvement.

How to Accurately Measure LBM

LBM calculation requires a body composition assessment. Methods ranked by accuracy and practicality:

• DEXA (DXA) scan — Gold standard: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Measures fat mass, lean mass, and bone density separately. Error rate ±1–2%. Available at many hospitals, sports medicine clinics, and some gyms. Cost: $40–$150 per scan. Best for serious athletes tracking composition changes.
• Hydrostatic weighing: Underwater weighing. Historically gold standard but impractical. Error rate ±1–3%.
• BodPod (Air displacement plethysmography): Air displacement device. Accuracy similar to underwater weighing. Available at universities and sports labs.
• Skinfold callipers: Technician measures skinfold thickness at multiple sites. Accuracy ±3–5% with skilled technician. Cost-effective for serial monitoring if same technician performs each measurement.
• Bioelectrical impedance (BIA): Consumer scales and handheld devices. Convenient but affected by hydration, meal timing, and temperature. Error ±3–8%. Use consistently (same time of day, hydration state) for relative trend monitoring rather than absolute values.